NOSSALSUCCESSBUTNOTGOING
I wrote this in like 15 minutes. It's one of my worse pieces so don't flame
Nationwide, recent controversy surrounding the permission of mobile phone use in school environments has sparked profound debate among parents, students, educators. Mobile phones provide a lifeline to everyone â allowing us to communicate and bond. However, it undoubtedly poses a severe threat to the behaviour and education of Australiaâs youth. There certainly is a plethora of factors which elucidate to this indisputable view.
To begin with, a regulation on mobile phone use in schools would ensure that pupils are behaving optimally. Throughout many schools in Australia, many students fall victim to the trap of cellular devices. As vividly depicted by many concerned parents, mobile devices lure us in, influencing our every action. As the need to be âcoolâ and âfit inâ rapidly gains more prominence, it has become evident that mobile phones only promote immature behaviour. By confining students to a strict learning environment, devoid of phones, respectful relationships could be promoted, and teachers could breathe easy. It is undeniable that utilising phones in schools cause more harm than good, and should therefore be banned, as it would ensure that students are behaving respectfully.
Furthermore, a ban on mobile devices will most likely result in an increase of focused learning and participation. As phones pose as a significant distraction to students, erasing them could enhance their motivation and will to learn about new topics and engage in classroom activities. For instance, James Clear, a renowned habit-formation researcher, notes that habits should be cut from the stem; in this case, phones are the stem of uninterest. By eliminating phone use, students can actively participate in classroom discussions without the need to check their phone or âsend a snapâ. Hence, it is evident that a prohibition of phones in schools will result in a friendly and engaging learning environment for students to prosper, thrive, and strive in.
Some critics argue that cellular devices are crucial as students need them to communicate with their caretakers, guardians, and parents. While this is partially true, it does negate the fact that schools can communicate on behalf of pupils. For instance, if a student is sick and needs to be picked up, the school office could notify the parents. There is no such necessity for an external phone to be utilised.
To conclude, it is evident that a mobile phone ban in schools could provide substantial benefits to our youth, educators, and communities. As the need to âact coolâ rises in prominence, questions arise surrounding our childrenâs educations. It is indisputable that prohibiting phones will eliminate this worry. Not only would a ban result in the promotion of focused learning, but it would also ensure that students are behaving respectfully, without pesky distractions pestering at them. Mobile phones undoubtedly cause more harm than good in a learning environment, and are therefore unnecessary.
