B
Bibliii

  • Joined Jan 23, 2023
  • Bibliii
    Make sure you have all the basics down pat, and understand what equations to ise when. Check if your library has any resources like the Oxford Study Buddy or ATARnotes topic tests. I found it really helped me. Understand your formula sheet, and write down any formulas that aren't on there, like the general equation of a sine or cosine function, things that are usueful. Use this when you are studying.

    With math, the only way to actually study is by practicing. Practice heaps. Check out the QCAA exam examples. Recycle through different textbook questions - the cambridge one has really good ones. Talk to your school or local librarian and ask if they have year 12 methods resources - it always helps. You could check out the VCAA and HSC past exams, and pick out the ones that are relevant.

    Hope this helped,
    -jinx_58

    • Also, it would be great if you could download those files from that link ASAP because I think I need to keep the tab open for it to work and I can't promise that tab will stay open for that long haha.

      • Bibliii
        Hi Bibliii,

        I marked both of those tests you did including giving you marks, pointing out where you went wrong and also answering the ones you didn't do. I cut a few corners here and there just to save time so ensure you add all the steps and explain where necessary. Also, in your exam, ensure you read every single question very very carefully EVEN if you've read similar questions a million times before. On top of that, go back and check what the question is asking you and if you answered it correctly.

        Other than that, here are the two marked tests: https://file.io/qYZjLj5PdNT1

        Hope that helps and good luck with your exam!

        • PP
      • Bibliii

        Ka = the equilibirum constant of an acid dissociation reaction eg for the equilibrium system HCOOH + H2O <-> HCOO- + H3O+, Ka = [H3O+][HCOO-] / [HCOOH] (remember you exclude water for aqueous equilibria since its concentration change is negligible)

        pKa = pH above which half of all acid molecules are deprotonated. Given by -log10(Ka), so higher pKa = weaker acid. If you inspect a titration curve, they're the half way points between equivalence points. They're really flat since when pH = pKa, an acid buffer system is most resistant to change according to the Henderson-Hasselbach equation (I don't know to what extent banana benders need to know this, I only learned Ka in uni chem in Victoria). You can memorise the property of pKa by the fact that when pH is above pKa, the equilibrium system is deficient in H+. According to Le Chat's principle, the system will want to partially oppose that, which it will by having your acid donate its proton.

        Kb = the equilibrium constant of a base ionisation reaction eg the Kb for NH3 + H2O <--> NH4+ + OH-, Kb = [OH-][NH4+] / [NH3]. Kb and Ka can be generalised as [ionised species] / [unionised species]

        pKb = the pH above which a base will be protonated. Similar story with pKa, when pH is above pKb, the system knows there's not enough H+. To compensate, you'll want less OH- in solution, forcing the base ionisation reaction to proceed in reverse

        H3O+ = the protonated form of water, ie its conjugate acid. Abundant in acidic conditions since the acid has donated its H+ to the solvent molecule (H2O).

        OH- = the deprotonated form of water ie its conjugate base. Abundant in basic conditions since the base has stolen H+s from H2O.

        One small correction to jinx's excellent response, technically strong acids also have Ka and pKa values despite the fact that strong acid ionisation is pretty irreversible. For example, we are required to know in uni that pKa of HCl is -5 for purposes of comparing leaving group strength in organic reactions. Ditto for strong bases with regards to Kb and pKb

        I don't know how QCE structures their data tests so someone else can help with that

      • Bibliii
        Hey Bibliii,

        Here are my answers to the theory questions in your first image. I skipped number 1 as I believe Lorentz force is a topic that is not in the syllabus and thus, you do not need to know (correct me if I'm wrong). However, if you like, I can take a look at the questions anyways.

        1. If you take a look at either the centripetal force equation (F=mv2/r) or the centripetal acceleration (a=v2/r) equation, you will notice that if you double the velocity (i.e. 2v) then due to the square, it will become 4v2. This means that the radius will increase by 4 times the original if you double the velocity.
        2. Sin(theta) is used as this gives the perpendicular component (y-axis) whereas cos(theta) would give the parallel component (x-axis). The component that is needed to represent the force relative to the magnetic field is the perpendicular component which is why sin(theta) is used.
        3. a) If the particle is positively charged, the direction of the force would be down. So, in this case, it would take path C.
          b) C (answered above as well)
          c) The kinetic energy should remain constant as the circular trajectory has a displacement of 0 and thus, there is no work done. No work done means no change in kinetic energy (according to the work-energy theorem).
          d) Negatively-charged particles would go up (path A)
          e) A neutral particle would travel in a straight line (path B) as magnetic fields only affect charged particles.

        Hope this helps and answers your questions and let me know if you have any other issues!

        • PP
      • Bibliii
        Hey Bibliii,

        All good - we're all happy to help!

        For the 8.2 review questions 5 and 6, it is a bit tricky and I just realised I didn't really explain it that well. So the main thing you need to do is draw the magnetic field lines on both magnets. As soon as you do this, you will notice that since both are north poles, the lines of each one will come towards each other (--> <--). So if we take a look at point A, would the LHS or RHS magnetic field line be stronger? It would definitely be the LHS magnet because it is closer and the RHS magnet would have a much weaker magnetic field line. So, now you need to take both of those magnetic field lines as vectors and find the vector sum so like this: ------> + <--- = --->. And that final arrow is pointing towards East. Does that make sense?

        Hope that clears it up and as always, let us know if you have any other questions.

        • PP
        • Bibliii
          For question 3 on the 8.1 Review, there’s this concept that the geographic North Pole - where Santa supposedly lives - is scientifically a South Pole. This is because the geographic North Pole attracts other magnetic North Poles.

          I hope this diagram helps: https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSqTPohiHrQQezAvOsUd-BBOOAuaK1PDzBIOw&usqp=CAU

          Idk if that makes sense but feel free to ask more questions.

          Also with the “magnets only work in magnet fields” thing, that not how it works. A magnet creates its own magnetic field. Every single one. So, because the Earth is a giant bar magnet, it creates it own magnetic field.

          However, if aluminium wire has a current flowing through it, a magnetic field is present. Any wire with an electric current creates a magnetic field. Check out the syllabus and the syllabus glossary, it really helps to see what QCAA actually want lol.

          -jinx_58

        • PhytoPlankton lol got beaten by you, I can confirm that you ain’t rusty and everything is correct here even though I personally would turn 50 mL into L since the concentration (0.06 mol/L) can only cancel out litres in dimensional analysis when following the c = n/v formula, and L is the most used volume unit in chem

        • Bibliii KOH as God notes is the strong base potassium hydroxide, potassium is denoted by the symbol K since it’s called kalium in Latin. To approach this question, I’d take -log10( ) of the concentration of KOH they gave you to get the pOH, and then rearrange the formula pOH + pH = pKw = 14 for pH

          For 17, hydrocyanic acid is a very weak acid judging from its low Ka magnitude so set up an ICE table as follows

          Initial [HCN] = 0.227 M, initial [CN-] = 0 M, initial [H+] = 0 M
          Change [HCN] = -x M, change [CN-] = +x M, change [H+] = +x M
          Equilibrium [HCN] = 0.227 - x M, equilibrium [CN-] = x M, equilibrium [H+] = x M

          Then equate the magnitude of Ka with your Ka expression

          6.2 x 10^-10 = (x M)2 / (0.227 M)*

          *In uni chem here in Victoria we’re always allowed to assume that the concentration change of an weak acid is 0, if QCE doesn’t allow it, you’ll have to use the quadratic formula.

          Now solving for x should give you [H+], which you should then convert into pH

          Ka isn’t the same as pKa, pKa is -log10(Ka) (whenever you see p in chem notation, it means -log10( ), such that pH = -log10(H+) and pOH = -log10(OH-))

          18 is a titration question that involves a dilution, always start with a balanced equation and remember that your standard was diluted by a factor of 10.

          So you know the original concentration of your standard was 31.8 g / 106 g/mol = 0.3 mol in 500 mL = 0.6 M. Diluting that by a factor 10 (use c1v1 = c2v2, where c1 = 0.6 M, v1 = 5 mL, c2 is your unknown and v2 = 50 mL). Your DILUTED concentration would be 0.06 M

          Now you know 50 mL of a 0.06 M Na2CO3 solution reacted with 16.8 mL of H2SO4 solution. The balanced equation is pretty simple since everything is 1:1:1:1:1 (Na2CO3 + H2SO4 —> Na2SO4 + H2O + CO2). Find n(Na2CO3), which will be equivalent to n(H2SO4) according to the balanced molar ratio. Then use c = n/v to find [H2SO4], remember that v must be in L so 16.8 mL = 0.0168 L.

        • Bibliii
          Hey Bibliii,

          I think QCE does it a different way so here are the solutions to all three questions in "QCE" terms (correct me if I'm wrong):
          16. KOH -> K+ + OH-
          So, as @God stated, there is a 1:1 molar ratio so [OH-] = [KOH] = 6.50 x 10^-3 M
          Since pOH = -log[OH-] = -log(6.50 x 10^-3 M) = 2.19
          So, to find pH = 14 - pOH = 14 - 2.19 = 11.81

          17. HCN -> H+ + CN-
          Ka = [H+][CN-]/[HCN] = 6.2 x 10^-10 (pKa is just -log(Ka))
          [H+][CN-]/[HCN] = (x)(x)/(0.227 - x) = 6.2 x 10^-10 and we usually assume x to be quite small so we take it as negligible (or we can calculate it with it but there's no point of wasting time for it).
          Thus, x2/0.227 M = 6.2 x 10^-10
          x2 = 1.407*10^-10
          x = 1.19 x 10^-5
          [H+] = 1.19 x 10^-5
          pH = -log[H+] = -log(1.19 x 10^-5) = 4.93

          18. The molar mass of Na2CO3 = 105.99 (you can calculate this through the periodic table but I searched it up from Google because I was lazy).
          So since the number of moles (n) = mass/molar mass, the number of moles (n) of Na2CO3 = 31.8 g/105.99 g mol^-1 = 0.30 mol
          This means concentration (c) = n/V = 0.30 mol/0.5 L = 0.60 M (concentration of Na2CO3 in 500 mL solution).
          The dilution factor is 10 because it is from 5 mL solution into 50 mL (this can also be worked out from C1V1=C2V2) so this means the concentration of Na2CO3 in 50 mL solution = 0.06 M.
          For the titration part, your best friend is C1V1=C2V2 so all you have to do is sub in all the values. The LHS will be the base part (Na2CO3) and the RHS is the acid part (H2SO4).
          C1V1=C2V2
          0.06 M x 50 mL = C2 x 16.8 mL (you should convert all mL->L like in the concentration calculation at the start but I ignored it here because it would be the same answer).
          C2 = 0.06 x 50 / 16.8 = 0.18 M
          Therefore, the concentration of H2SO4 is 0.18 M.

          Make sure to always write the reaction equation at the start of the question - that's very important. This is how I was taught to calculate when I did QCE but anyone, let me know if anything's wrong because it's been a while. Hope that helps!

          • PP
          • Bibliii

            Hi 🙂

            1. KOH is potassium hydroxide, which is a base. (When in solution, it goes to OH- and K+ ions)

            So [OH-] = [KOH]

            And then [H+] = 10^-14/[OH-]

            And then ph= -log 10 ([h+]}

            (I could be slightly wrong there, I am a little rusty)

            I can’t do 17 since I did VCE (vic high school) and we didn’t have Ka. Billzene might be able to help though)

            And Q18 is giving me serious ptsd just looking at it , and i might have a crack tomorrow. 😉

            Night!
            -G

          • Bibliii

            Hi Bibliii,

            Conventional current is what we use to describe most circuits. It is the flow of charge (specifically positive charge).

            In chemistry, you view current as the flow of electrons. But because electrons are negatively charged, and old science people were stupid and thought they were positive, it is in the opposite direction.

            All u need to know is that conventional current flows from positive + to negative -!

            Where as the electrons flow from negative to positive.

            2) In terms of the ‘right hand rule’ there are two main ones.

            • Magnetic Force on a moving charged particle.
              Thumb in direction of current (direction the + charge is moving), fingers in direction of magnetic field, and ur palm shows the direction of the force.

            If it’s an electron, which is negative, u point ur thumb in the opposite direction to the electrons movement.

            • Magnetic Field from a wire.
              Thumb in direction of current. Curl fingers like a fist. Looking at it from the pinky end shows which way the magnetic field runs (clockwise/anticlockwise)

            There are two more, one for Lenz’s law: which is finding which direction the current must flow when a coil of wire is moved in a magnetic field. And one for finding the north/South Pole of a coil of wire (solenoid). But u can also use the magnetic field one instead, it just hurts ur head a bit more.

            Hope this helps,
            -G

            • Bibliii

              IKR!! everyone is so niceee. Honestly just being Indian is kinda stressful with all the aunties and family friends constantly talking about ATARs in Dec but I'm really lucky that my parents don't really force me and try their best to motivate me.

            • Bibliii
              Macbeth is usually the external assessment unless your teacher assigns something else. One tip that I was given but forgot to use was making sure I understood the play by reading the translated version of Shakespearean English. If you go on the old forums, literallylauren has given some awesome advice regarding Macbeth.

              -jinx_58

              • Bibliii
                All good and yeah, that does sound like a pain. You certainly can get feedback and help here whenever you need it. I have created a thread for urgent help for external exams but I will also create another one for urgent questions if you have a question the day before an assessment is due as well.

                There'll be people around to help.

                • PP
                • Howdy howdy!

                  I did QCE Chem and Phys so I understand the position you are in right now. Data tests usually consist of graphs or tables and identifying the relationship between two variables, using certain data points to find the value of a third variable etc. If your school library or any library has the Oxford Study Buddy for Chemistry and Physics, I highly suggest you get those - they saved my externals. If you cant find them, they’re usually $30 each.

                  For Physics, the data tests are usually based on different formulas. For Example, in a graph if you’re given how the current changes as the resistance changes across a circuit, you might be asked a) Find the voltage and b) Determine the mathematical relationship between the two.
                  Note: Always remember the mathematical relationship means the gradient. If you go to the QCAA website and look for the data tests there, it might be a better example.

                  For Chemistry, it’s very much based off experiments. There’s a few more explanations you need to give. For example, if it’s an equilibrium question, they’ll give you a graph and you’ll have to identify if it’s an endothermic or exothermic reaction, and give a sentence why. Other questions from this graph might be, that the concentration of the products were increased, how does it affect the equilibrium position, amount of reactants etc etc.

                  I hope this helped, and feel free to shoot more questions,
                  -jinx_58