for the exam do we need to know the numbers of each input and output for photosynthesis and cellular respiration?

    clazah and johntenpiece
    Here is my explanation of the process of producing insulin (principles remain the same for other proteins/applications). Probably will be unlikely for VCAA to want all the specifics on the reporter gene and certain chemicals, but I find some of these details helpful when trying to understand the bigger picture of the process. Honestly, at this point, it's hard to really know what VCAA will want, considering we're all on a new study design.

    Making the recombinant plasmids:

    1. Plasmid vectors are prepared by scientists, containing the ampR (ampicillin resistant gene -> antibiotic resistance). It also contains a reporter gene called lacZ and specific recognition sites specifically for BamHI. Note that when lacZ is expressed, if produces what is called β-galactosidase, which is an enzyme that converts a substrate called X-gal from colourless to blue.
    2. Two plasmids are required, one for insulin subunit A and one for insulin subunit B (insulin is a quaternary protein). BamHI is then used for both plasmid samples to make a cut in each plasmid and two cuts in each insulin subunit. This forms complementary sticky ends. Note that the cut in the plasmid occurs in the middle of the LacZ reporter gene.
    3. DNA ligase is then used to join the subunits into their respective plasmids by creating phosphodiester bonds (reforms the sugar-phosphate backbone), forming two different types of recombinant plasmids.

    Creating the transformed bacteria:

    1. Plasmids are added to a solution of E.coli bacteria.
    2. Heat shock or electroporation is used to increase the permeability of the bacterial plasma membranes, encouraging them to take up the plasmids. Of course, not all the bacteria will
    3. Bacteria cultures are spread and incubated on agar plates containing X-gal and ampicillin. Colourless colonies can be determined as the transformed bacteria with the insulin subunit gene in it, as the lacZ gene is not longer active due to the insulin gene of interest having been inserted in the middle of it. Blue colonies are therefore concluded to be the transformed bacteria without the insulin subunit gene in it. Obviously, any colonies that are still surviving highlights that they contain the plasmids due to be ampicillin resistant (non-transformed bacteria will have died off).
    4. Recombinant plasmids then produce an insulin subunit with a β-galactosidase tail,
      which is formed from the half of the lacZ gene which has been transcribed and translated (probably not all that important to know about).

    Producing the insulin and extracting it:

    1. The transformed bacteria that contain the plasmids are placed in conditions that allow them to exponentially reproduce before their membranes break down.
    2. The insulin that they produce is isolated and purified.
    3. The two insulin chains have their β-galactosidase tails removed.
    4. The two insulin chains are then mixed, allowing them to form disulphide bonds (covalent bonds between sulphur atoms in the insulin subunits) to create functional human insulin that can be used for diabetic patients.

    In terms of the general process, a similar process occurs, but different antibiotic resistance genes and reporter will be used. The restriction endonucleases will differ as well. Anyway, I hope this helps!

    johntenpiece I'm not entirely sure how important ELISA will be for the exam, but it is a helpful example of an immunological method of identifying pathogens.

    Steps of the sandwich method of ELISA = Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay:

    1. Antibodies specific to a certain pathogen are attached to a plate.
    2. The serum (fluid and solute components of blood) sample being tested is applied to the plate. This means the antibodies will attach to any pathogen antigens that correspond in a complementary manner to its antigen-binding site.
    3. Second detection antibody, linked to a colour changing enzyme, is added to the plate. It will bind to any antibody-antigen complexes.
    4. Substrate is then added for the enzyme, reacting to this enzyme on the second antibody and changing colour to reveal whether any pathogenic antigens are present. Note that it can only bind to the substrate if the enzyme has bound to the antibody-antigen complexes, as this process likely (I think, but I'm not 100% sure) alters the active site of the enzyme to facilitate it binding to the substrate.

    Note: There are also three other types of ELISA tests -> Direct, indirect, and competitive. I don't know anything about these, but if someone does, I'd love to know about it!

    clazah ummm…. Could be wrong, but Is the first one bound to some membrane/cell type thing. Where the other one is free to float around?

    Like the literal meaning of ‘attached’, and free meaning not-attached?

    Could be wrong though. (New study design an all) Hope this helps : )

      clazah attached antibody = antibody on a B cell; used during clonal selection in humoral response.
      Free antibody = singular antibody floating in either the blood or lymph, which can bind to antigens on pathogens and create an antibody-antigen complex. This enhances phagocytosis of the pathogen.

        clazah attached might be referring to membrane bound antibody receptors (like God said). That would include B cell receptors (not T cell receptor though because they're not a type of antibody). Free antibodies would just be the antibodies produced by plasma B cells to target specific antigens, causing opsonisation, agglutination, neutralisation, etc.

        Edit: Haha bioho4! Two minds think alike!

        clazah 26 or 28 ATP (it's on the biology FAQ document on the VCAA website, as most textbooks have the numbers wrong).

        can somebody please explain this multiple choice question: The insulin produced by recombinant DNA technology is.. the answer was; produced from human insulin mRNA.

          clazah
          Universal = Same codons code for the same amino acids in different species. This is all about the "universal" nature of the codon to amino acid system.

          Degenerate = Multiple codons code for the same amino acid -> Results in a level of redundancy, whereby some mutations won't actually alter the amino acid (silent mutation)

          I was doing a multiple choice question from the practice exams Nelson net provided, and one of the questions implied that you knew the difference between degeneracy and redundancy.
          Is there a difference at all?

          Thanks