mhs-grinder definitely learn quadratics, they're a must for SEHS especially since they switched to ACER
learn some shortcuts to complete the square as well, will save you heaps of time

  • MMHS replied to this.

    scamran
    agreed but its very late for someone to just learn it now bc yes ig watching a few videos wont hurt anyone but being exposed to different types of questions involving quadratic is the part that takes a long time, like I know pythag and quadratics/trig and quadratic overlap a lot. But yeah very good point. Also, if u don't mind me asking, what are your preferences for the test? Mine are Mhs, then suzanne, i didn't put nossal bc its too far away

      MMHS im already at mhs, current y11 (test in 2021, edutest, no writing bc covid)

      wow! Congrats!! Did u attend any tutoring like James An

      Could u perhaps disclose ur scores if thats ok?

        MMHS thank you !!
        yeah i did a lot
        henderson's, james an, random papers from family friends, etc.
        we just had the 4 tests, i got 4 superiors (iirc they still use that form of marking??)

        but to be clear there are a few people in my year with 1 or 2 superiors as well

          scamran

          did u do well on jac practise exams?I dont get the highest scores in jac so im kinda scared for the actual exam,but some people say jac is harder than the actual test?

            sui JAC is definitely hard, especially since the wording isnt always great
            it is definitely harder than the actual test, but at the same time you want to be able to answer aroud 40-50 out of 60 questions, by the time the test comes around

            • sui likes this.
            • MMHS replied to this.

              MMHS the mock test wasn't the accurate in my opinion tho. Like they made numerical unreasonably difficult. Unless your talking about JAC sim tests

              Ronaldo
              Can u or anyone please send some examples of some of these fallacy questions...

                Fallacy: Identify the fallacy
                Premise 1: All birds fly
                Premise 2: Penguins are birds
                Conclusion: Penguins fly

                A) Oversimplification B) Politician’s Fallacy C) Generalisation D) None Of The Above E) None - this is a paradox